June 2009 Archives by author
Starting: Mon Jun 1 04:43:57 PDT 2009
Ending: Tue Jun 30 12:31:23 PDT 2009
Messages: 47
- [lsb-discuss] New SI beta packages, applances
Stew Benedict
- [lsb-discuss] LSB CVS repository
Stew Benedict
- [lsb-discuss] failed to execute LSB4.0 perl testset in dtk-manager-2
Stew Benedict
- [lsb-discuss] failed to execute LSB4.0 perl testset in dtk-manager-2
Cao, Jenny Q
- [lsb-discuss] Couldn't find the X11 fonts directory when executing X11 related test sets in dtk-manager-2
Cao, Jenny Q
- [lsb-discuss] failed to execute LSB4.0 perl testset in dtk-manager-2
Cao, Jenny Q
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Alan Cox
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Alan Cox
- [lsb-discuss] [Fwd: Re: Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?]
Alan Cox
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Alan Cox
- [lsb-discuss] LSB routing capabilities
Alan Cox
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Till Kamppeter
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Till Kamppeter
- [lsb-discuss] Signing packages
Till Kamppeter
- [lsb-discuss] lzma a big win... time to include it in lsb 4.1?
Dan Kegel
- [lsb-discuss] LSB conference call agenda (2009-06-03, 11am ET)
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] LSB SDK 4.0.1 Release Candidate
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] LSB conference call agenda (2009-06-10, 11am ET)
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] [Fwd: Re: Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?]
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] LSB conference call agenda (2009-06-17, 11am ET)
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] LSB conf call notes for 2009-06-17
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] LSB conference call agenda (2009-06-24, 11am ET)
Jeff Licquia
- [lsb-discuss] Signing packages
Dan Lopez
- [lsb-discuss] lzma a big win... time to include it in lsb 4.1?
Bill Nottingham
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Martin Pitt
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Martin Pitt
- [lsb-discuss] ELF header question
Robert Schweikert
- [lsb-discuss] LSB routing capabilities
Pavel Shved
- [lsb-discuss] ELF header question
Denis Silakov
- [lsb-discuss] LSB CVS repository
Marc Tardif
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Theodore Tso
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Theodore Tso
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Theodore Tso
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Theodore Tso
- [lsb-discuss] [Fwd: Re: Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?]
Theodore Tso
- [lsb-discuss] lzma a big win... time to include it in lsb 4.1?
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] LSB routing capabilities
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] LSB CVS repository
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] ELF header question
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] FW: HAL is in maintenance mode
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] Signing packages
Wichmann, Mats D
- [lsb-discuss] Possible to get rid of /usr/bin/sendmail requirement in LSB 4.1?
Anthony W. Youngman
- [lsb-discuss] [Bug 993] ELF extensions for thread local storage
bugzilla-daemon at linux-foundation.org
Last message date:
Tue Jun 30 12:31:23 PDT 2009
Archived on: Mon Jul 6 07:36:05 PDT 2009
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).