[lsb-discuss] Building and checking a 3.0 compliant package under the 4.0 SDK

[Wichmann, Mats D]

Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:08:34PM -0400, Stew Benedict wrote:
>> Jeff Licquia wrote:
>>> 
>>> Go ahead and send directly to me; I doubt the list needs to see it.
>>> :-) 
>>> 
>> Is "30" the correct string? Man page and --lsb-version seems to
>> imply "3.0" 
> 
> I think this may be what's going on.  I've received the results
> off-list from Steve, and the errors are consistent with having built
> for LSB 4.0 and tested for LSB 3.0.

perhaps the tools should do a little more validation, such as
rejecting version options that aren't recognized (or being
more broad-minded about what to accept)?  Perhaps that's 
part of the task discussed last week to provide an argument
stress-tester for LSB tools.