[lsb-discuss] LSB conference call agenda (Tuesday, September 5, 11am ET)
dank at kegel.com
Mon Sep 11 11:17:04 PDT 2006
On 9/6/06, Wichmann, Mats D <mats.d.wichmann at intel.com> wrote:
> >> You "escape" a library by adding it to LSBCC_SHAREDLIBS -
> >This will not work for us. We have a relatively large number of shared
> >libraries. As we link each library and executable the list of
> >dependencies changes. This means we'd have to reset the environment for
> >every link based on the precomputed dependencies. Setting all the
> >libraries all the time appears overkill.
> Any thoughts on a design that would work to accommodate that?
How about a way to add wildcards? e.g. doing
before the build would say "any shared library under my build tree is ok"?
More information about the lsb-discuss