[Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] ARM virtualization
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.wilk at oracle.com
Tue Jun 26 13:46:26 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to propose "ARM virtualization" as a topic for discussion
> at the next Kernel Summit:
> - Xen on ARM guests
> having the opportunity of starting from scratch, we would like to
> get rid of the distinction between PV guests and HVM guests that is
> present on Xen x86, keeping the best of both world.
> - device tree support and a common boot sequence
> even though the "hardware" available in a Xen ARM guest is very
> different from a real platform, Xen is going to use a device tree to
> describe it, so that we can have the same boot sequence in a Xen ARM
> guest, in Dom0 and on native.
> Is the Linux device tree support flexible enough to allow it?
> - calling convention
> I would like to discuss the introduction of a common hypercall calling
> convention across multiple hypervisors on ARM.
> - event channel notifications
> In the x86 world we use three different mechanisms: a direct upcall from
> the hypervisor in PV guests; a PCI interrupt for basic HVM guests; a
> direct vector injection in more advanced PV on HVM guests. What is the
> most efficient and less disruptive way of introducing event notifications
> on ARM? Do we need to allocate an SGI (or a PPI) for Xen usage?
> - collaboration with KVM
> Aside from the hypercall calling convention, we might be able to share
> other pieces of the infrastructure. I would like to make sure that we
> think about them before writing any code.
> I would also like to attend the "Wither the baseline" discussion around
> Hooks and Notifiers, submitted by HPA, and "zero copy networking"
> submitted by Michael S. Tsirkin, as I have stated in my other emails.
Ditto from me. I've an strong interest in the withher the baseline discssion.
The zero copy networking sounds exciting as well.
More information about the Ksummit-2012-discuss