[Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
jason.wessel at windriver.com
Thu Jun 21 14:22:07 UTC 2012
On 06/21/2012 09:05 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:59 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
>> 2) The maintainers with non-reversible trees
>> * Having a maintainer who can get a 24 hour period before etching
>> something in stone in non-reversible branches would be a world
>> better than what we have today.
> I believe that this is exactly what tip does today.
I could have sworn you stated that tip gets a build failure, you add
another patch etc... At the point in time it is in tip, isn't it
already in stone and you have recorded a point that is not actually
bisectable for some number of patches?
One of the key points here was trying to improve bisectability (and
also as a direct result the general input quality).
More information about the Ksummit-2012-discuss