[Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] Patch review, bug/regression tracking, device hiererchy extensions

John 'Warthog9' Hawley warthog9 at kernel.org
Sat Jun 16 04:05:04 UTC 2012


On 06/15/2012 09:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:23:43PM -0600, John 'Warthog9' Hawley wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 05:15 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:35:17PM -0600, John 'Warthog9' Hawley wrote:
>>>> On 06/15/2012 04:18 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:08:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:53:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>> As far as the BZ is concerned, I don't think there's any hope it will be
>>>>>>> used consistently and universally within our community.  Some subsystems will
>>>>>>> use it, others won't.  So, perhaps it would be a good idea to add bug
>>>>>>> categories when requested by subsystem maintainers and remove the ones that
>>>>>>> no one is going to take care of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that would be a very good idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Second that. Whenever I look for hwmon bugs, I pretty much get all crashes
>>>>> involving a loaded hwmon module. Not very helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Adding the categories isn't hard, just need the subsystem maintainers to
>>>> request them.
>>>>
>>> Does the system permit sub-categories ? hwmon as sub-category to drivers would
>>> be great.
>>
>> The tree topology looks like this:
>>
>> +- Bugzilla
>> |
>> +--+ Product 1
>> |  |
>> |  +--> Components
>> |
>> +--> Product 2
>> etc
>>
>> so yes hwmon could be a sub-category of drivers, though there's already
>> a `Drivers -> Hardware Monitoring` product / category.
>>
> Ah, that is good enough. Guess those bugs are assigned to Jean, correct ?

Defaults to khali at linux-fr.org


More information about the Ksummit-2012-discuss mailing list