[Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux

[Vladislav Bolkhovitin]

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:42:51 +0400
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst at vlnb.net> wrote:
> 
>>> Hmm, really? STGT development is more active IET.
>> Tomo-san, be honest. It was *you*, who stopped the IET development, 
>> forcing people to switch to STGT. There is no point to prepare patches 
>> for IET, if they will never get merged.
> 
> I stopped working on IET but it doesn't mean that I force others to
> stop working on IET. Arne said that he merges patches.

Well, how about declaring unlimited code freeze for all core parts? Has 
anybody, except you, had a right to merge patches to IET? Which %% of 
coming non-trivial patches have you merged in the last few years? Near 
zero? For instance, how many not too bad patches from Ross S. W. Walker 
were silently ignored? He didn't received even small comments, which 
made him so frustrated, so he stopped all the development activities?

Vlad