[Desktop_architects] Desktop_architects Digest, Vol 16, Issue 8
Olaf Schmidt
ojschmidt at kde.org
Thu Feb 22 03:12:12 PST 2007
[ Constantinos P. Spiliakos, Mi., 21. Feb. 2007 21:38 ]
> True, Gnome might be easy to learn, but then, so is KDE, Gnome is quite
> archaic in some ways (nautilus for example) but quite efficient in other
> ways (low memory usage).
It is true that Gnome has a very efficient memory usage compared with e.g.
Windows XP or Vista. The same can be said with even greater truth of the
other desktops:
http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html
http://swik.net/GNOME/Planet+GNOME/Callum+McKenzie:+KDE+vs.+GNOME:
+Memory+Use/qmla
Olaf
More information about the Desktop_architects
mailing list