[Desktop_architects] Printing dialog and GNOME

Kurt Pfeifle k1pfeifle at gmx.net
Tue Dec 13 02:51:02 PST 2005


On Tuesday 13 December 2005 01:33, Till Kamppeter wrote:

> Frederic told that the options from the PPD file are intentionally mot
> listed in the printing dialog, the usability team of GNOME was against
> listing these options. They clutter the dialog and can be more confusing
> than useful to the user.

This is not a wise decision.

Because it means there is no usability at all for many features: you
can not *use* them, they are not there at all, they are forbidden to
the user by some higher usability being.

Usubility for a given feature starts to become debate-able only where 
the feature is already present, where something can be done *at all*.
Before, there is the land of un-usability.

What type of printers do you think users in many enterprise environ-
ments are used to? It is the 60 pages per minute model, that can do
duplex and stapling and punching and cover-sheets-on-cardbox-paper
and watermark and foo and bar and morestuff... 

I was one of the guys who pushed for adding all features (which the
underlying CUPS provided) into the user interface of KDEPrint.

And I know for a fact that KDE's power in printing matters (given to
it by CUPS) was the one feature that determined a pro-KDE decision
in Linux desktop rollouts in Europe. 

I also know that the printing dialog of KDE can be improved a *lot*
from where it is now. However, this is much more difficult than
just removing most features and declare their un-usability to be
the new religion of usability.

We'll work on that for KDE 4, but without removing any feature (we
will rather be adding some more, because the wonderful CUPS 1.2
gives them to us for free).

Cheers,
Kurt



More information about the Desktop_architects mailing list