[PATCH 2/2] c/r: Add AF_INET support (v3)

Dan Smith danms at us.ibm.com
Mon Jul 13 12:10:28 PDT 2009


JD> Why?  It seems that this would cause checkpoints to fail
JD> unexpectedly,

Well, there are other places where the checkpoint will fail with EBUSY
because something is in a transitional state.

JD> and is probably unnecessary in a migration scenario, because the
JD> peer will retransmit the segments given appropriate ACKs.

Cool, sounds like we can punt on this particular one... Thanks :)

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms at us.ibm.com


More information about the Containers mailing list