<html>
<head>
<DEFANGED_style type="text/css">
<!--
body { margin-bottom: 1px; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; line-height: normal; font-variant: normal }
-->
</DEFANGED_style>
</head>
<body DEFANGED_style="margin-bottom: 1px; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px">
<DIV> Thanks - I've used the original document as a template, but did away with the frames...basically, just kept the cover sheet :-)
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>A first cut is in internal review<br><br>>>>Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> 05/03/05 3:54 pm >>><br>Ed,<br><br>The security spec has undergone some pretty serious changes as the<br>result of about 6 hours of live editing.  Some things we did were to<br>standardize the format to match the rest of the cgl specs, remove all<br>1st person/2nd person comments, tweak some of the requirements to be<br>more specific, table-ize many of the items that could have been in<br>tables, and bulletize many of the bullet-able things.  Both Joseph and<br>Mike provided their input on these efforts and had "override authority"<br>over john/I wanting to make the spec have one voice with the remaining<br>specifications.<br><br>If you want the latest version, its in the cgl specs group at<br>groups.osdl.org or I can mail you a copy.  We hope to have it finalized<br>by Wednesday.  Also, it really wont work in OO because OO is missing<br>some key features we require for a document of this type.  As much as I<br>dislike having to use windows, there really is little choice when<br>working on these sorts of documents..<br><br>regards<br>-steve<br><br>On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:23, Ed Reed wrote:<br>>Oh, I was just going to try to match up with the formating, but<br>>content is more important, now, than being pretty.<br>> <br>>For this pass, the frames are history.  Someone can go back in with MS<br>>Word if they really think it's that important and reformat the<br>>information.<br>> <br>>Ed<br>><br>>>>>"Chen, Terence" <terence.chen@intel.com> 05/03/05 12:17 pm >>><br>>Steve and John from CGL side are in the process of cleaning up the<br>>security spec. I believe Steve is planning to have it finalized by<br>>tomorrow. You might want to wait for the "cleaned" version available<br>>tomorrow.<br>><br>>-Terence<br>><br>>>-----Original Message-----<br>>>From: security_sig-bounces@lists.osdl.org [mailto:security_sig-<br>>>bounces@lists.osdl.org] On Behalf Of Matt Anderson<br>>>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:25 AM<br>>>To: Ed Reed<br>>>Cc: security_sig@osdl.org<br>>>Subject: Re: [Security_sig] Help! I've got frames, and I can't figure<br>>>outhow to get them ordered in OO!<br>>><br>>>On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:04 -0600, Ed Reed wrote:<br>>>>Hi -<br>>>><br>>>>I'm trying to edit a version of the CGL security doc that Ge sent<br>>out,<br>>>>and it's got these cute little frames for each of the "capabilities"<br>>-<br>>>>looks like a table, shaded headers, a few open text cells...<br>>>><br>>>>But they stack on top of each other and I can't for the life of me<br>>>>figure out by what reason or logic they position with respect to<br>>each<br>>>>other...does anyone have a "frames for dummies" hint they could<br>>share<br>>>>with me?<br>>><br>>>I can't really help you with a frames for dummies guide, or hints on<br>>>getting the placement right, but I can at least tell you why those<br>>>frames are there.  The frames that are below another frame are there<br>>so<br>>>that when the document is viewed or printed they are hidden.  Their<br>>>purpose is to be used to generate the table of contents for the<br>>>document.<br>>><br>>>As for OOo, good luck.  This seems to be part of the missing 10%.  I<br>>did<br>>>find that the 2.x version of OOo did handle it a little better than<br>>1.x,<br>>>but I ended up going back to Word when I was dealing with any of<br>>that.<br>>>I ended up finding OOo for content, Word for formatting.<br>>><br>>>-matt<br>><br>><br><br> </DIV>
</body>
</html>