[Openais] Re: Implement configuration change support.
sakai.miyotaka at nttcom.co.jp
Wed Sep 8 15:02:12 PDT 2004
John Cherry wrote:
>>>>Is bitkeeper necessary to implement ?
>>>>Do you have another way ?
>>>>( I don't have the bitkeeper licence .)
>>>>Or should I have bitkeepr licence ( for future ) ?
>>>Bitkeeper is free (depending on your definition..) for open source
>>>work. Agreeing to the license just allows you to use it, but doesn't
>>>require any payments. I'd suggest speaking with a lawyer on the subject
>>>if your concerned though.
>>>But you don't have to use bitkeeper if you don't want. diff is fine
>>>with me for now. Bitkeeper is only really absolutely required for
>>>direct write access. If you need write access later we can address the
>>>issues at that time.
>>I have got the license .
>>But it is first time for me to use Bitkeeper .
>>I 'll send another message after this message .
>>Please catch that .
>If you don't need to use bitkeeper, you can grab tarballs at:
>A new tarball is generated each day the bitkeeper tree is updated, no
>matter how small the change.
Thank you for your advice .
If the change is small , I 'll send patches and ask Steve to check in .
- Miyotaka Sakai .
More information about the Openais